Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Garrett's avatar

I'm not sure how to process this one. I get and agree with the importance of the physical, especially today. Although I'd question if people liked Anthropic's caps because they were a proof of presence or because they were free and had a funny word on it (which gets funnier and funnier when you think about the fact that neither Anthropic nor most people who wear them might be considering how 'thinking' is an ironic word coming from an AI company).

But, from there, I don't understand the jump to company merch. Once it's sold, do you still see them as proof of presence? I can see that if you go to a festival and get your favorite band's tour shirt, sure. But what about a jacket that you order online from a company store?

I think I understand what you mean about the quality and the design. Some swag/merch doesn't have the right to be that good. Having worked in tech companies, I have some of these pieces myself. But how do we square the sentiment "we give a shit about everything we produce" with the terrible outcomes that some of them create?

Even if we decouple intention from outcome and externalities, wouldn't that feed the idea that, ultimately, a company doesn't really care about anything other than itself? Aren't swag giveaways a calculated branding maneuver, and isn't merch carefully priced to make money?

A company may care about the quality of a jacket and the impression that it leaves on their customers, while simultaneously not care about them as people. From that moment on, does the quality really represent their general attitude?

No hate here, just trying to get your additional thoughts on it. <3

No posts

Ready for more?