Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom White's avatar

Mark Zuckerberg and Peter Thiel understood this years ago: https://www.techemails.com/p/mark-zuckerberg-peter-thiel-millennials

“Peter and I have had a number of conversations about what we expect the world to look like in 2030 so we can plan and position our future work accordingly. One theme we've discussed is that many important institutions in our society (eg education, healthcare, housing, efforts to combat climate change) are still run primarily by boomers in ways that transfer a lot of value from younger generations to boomers themselves. Our macro prediction for the next decade is that we expect this dynamic to shift very rapidly as more millennials + gen Zers can now vote and as the boomer generation starts to shrink. By the end of this decade, we expect more of these institutions to be run by and for the benefit of millennials and younger generations. I would bet we'll even see a millennial president within the next few cycles by 2032. This outlook for the future puts our current tone and positioning in stark contrast and has convinced me that we should shift the center of gravity in our messaging to be more focused on millennials…

[W]hen 70% of Millennials say they are pro-socialist, we need to do better than simply dismiss them by saying that they are stupid or entitled or brainwashed; we should try and understand why. And, from the perspective of a broken generational compact, there seems to be a pretty straightforward answer to me, namely, that when one has too much student debt or if housing is too unaffordable, then one will have negative capital for a long time and/or find it very hard to start accumulating capital in the form of real estate; and if one has no stake in the capitalist system, then one may well turn against it.

What I would add to Mark's summary is that, in a healthier society, the handover from the Boomers to the younger generations should have started some time ago (maybe as early as the 1990s for Gen X), and that for a whole variety of reasons, this generational transition has been delayed as the Boomers have maintained an iron grip on many US institutions. When the handover finally happens in the 2020s, it will therefore happen more suddenly and perhaps more dramatically than people expect or than such generational transitions have happened in the past. And that's why it's especially important for us to think about these issues and try and get ahead of them.

One example of such an "iron grip" from my colleague Eric Weinstein: Of the 67 top research universities in the US, 62 have Baby Boomer presidents (three are Silent Generation and only two are Generation X). Today, the median age of these 67 university presidents is 65 years-old... And this is very different from the recent past. Only thirty years ago, in 1990, the median age of these same university presidents was a much lower 52-years old; the older generation did not completely refuse to give up power; and therefore much greater generational diversity was to be found in university leadership.

Or, to take a small but suggestive example from US Presidential leadership: Three Presidents (Clinton, Bush 43, and Trump) were all born within 70 days of one another, in the summer of 1946. These three people were literally at the head of the Baby Boomer class that was born nine months after World War II ended in September 1945. In my mind, they somehow derived much of their power from the self-referential narcissism of the Boomers as this unusually large cohort of people voted for people like themselves and could afford to ignore anyone younger... and again, this iron grip has been maintained for a shockingly long period of time; but it will not be maintained forever.”

Expand full comment
Gently, Jack Jones's avatar

A couple of items - kudos for taking this on, Tom! Generational studies are a great interest of mine.

However like commenter Janis I too feel that the boomers as a whole are not viewed accurately by the younger generations, and have become a convenient punching bag and scapegoat - yet boomers were exploited, manipulated, and used as unwilling cannon fodder. Boomers had much the same relationship with the older generations as the younger generations do now with them.

Also, GenX is no longer “young”, when the youngest of them is pushing 45. (BTW, Musk, Thiel, and much of Scumbag’s cabinet are GenX and Millennials, sticking it to their own generations!)

This is really rooted in class war, which has been going on for centuries and which every generation has been affected by-including boomers!

But this is a good starting point to discuss these things further so thank you!

I’ll be back after work to add more - this 68 year old “boomer” is working til 70, in large part due to financial reasons. We did not all retire at 59!

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts