Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeffrey Flathers's avatar

Yes, I noticed that on my YouTube feed, Tom. I am very interested in World War II videos and documentaries. Up until last year. Most of these videos were narrated by human voice. About a year ago I noticed that many of these content creators switched over to AI narration. This was painfully obvious given the poor pronunciation of many words and phrases. Moreover, many of these AI produced videos, push out, factually incorrect information, the details of which can easily be checked on the Internet. Sadly, artificial intelligence may inundate us with misinformation to the point that we don’t know fact from fiction. Your 90/10 analogy is well taken. Didn’t Edison posit that success was one percent inspiration, and 99% perspiration? Happy writing!

Aria's avatar

This is an absolutely valuable way to look at it. Also, it is the consequence of not teaching / explaining students that writing is thinking and why one should write.

We only see the output in writing; the result; we make the mistake to think writing is just expressing thinking that already existed.

But writing is thinking.

Once this counterintuitive insight is understood, one can discern for oneself.

I want to use AI to get results fast in areas where I don’t see value for me in getting better. Scale my company; sort my emails; show me patterns in data so I can think better — in essence — remove noise for me — and free up time so I can focus on what I actually like and enjoy. But what people do outsource writing as thinking to AI and that will atrophy thinking if there’s no intervention.

And all of that is okay. Ultimately we have responsibility for the decisions we make; even when we are not aware of the outcomes.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?